|
Issue: Healthcare
Date: April 28, 2004
Author: Ken Larsen
--------------------
QUESTION #4
Healthcare costs here in Utah continue to climb, even outstripping
inflation. What innovative ideas or initiatives would your administration
put forward to a) lower healthcare costs and b) make coverage available to
those Utahn's that either cannot afford the premiums or have been declined
coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Can this be accomplished without
increased taxes or spending?
Tom Gregory
Contributing Editor, UtahPolitics.org
------------------
Ken Larsen's answer:
My personal interpretation of "personal choice" adds a cost to the privilege
of personal choice, and that's personal responsibility. Whatever it is I am
giving the needy, and no matter how needy they are, I have no right to force
others to help. That would be stealing, even it if is for a worthy cause.
Charity should be a personal choice. As strongly as I intend to advocate
private charities, I cannot help government "steal" from those who
personally choose not to participate. To reap the spiritual rewards of
giving, one must have the free agency not to give.
Having said that, there is a great deal government can stop doing that will
help reduce the costs of health care. Regulations and inappropriate law
suits are forcing doctors to choose much more rigorous and expensive testing
than reason would dictate. Protectionism of drug company monopolies is
keeping prescription drug prices outrageously high. I would work to
eliminate those government regulations whose supposed benefits do not
justify the increased costs. I would work to limit medical lawsuits to those
cases that involve actual criminal negligence or fraud. The 99% of patients
who are statistically expected to benefit from a treatment should not suffer
because of the 1% who do not benefit. Instead of transferring more tax money
to wealthy drug companies, I would not allow the criminal prosecution of
Utah citizens for purchasing their medicine more cheaply from other sources
(countries). "Personal Choice and Personal Responsibility" will be my health
care slogan.
One more consideration. Perhaps the increase in medical costs is partly a
reflection of the increased value of medical treatment. New devices,
techniques and drugs continually increase the natural value of American
medicine. Perhaps it is unreasonable to expect society to provide everyone
with Cadillac treatment.
Ken
|